Principles
A number of authorities
seek contributions in relation to employment uses. This
section describes some of the frameworks emerging in local
areas.
Key principles that emerge from these examples below are:
- obligations can relate to office, shop, retail and retail
warehouse uses;
- local authorities normally employ cut off points, a common one
being 1000sq m of gross floor space;
- assumed or actual occupancy is taken from local survey
figures;
- authorities may request full contributions (Windsor and
Maidenhead) or reduced contributions based on percentage of staff
from outside the area (South Northamptonshire) or the percentage of
the day assumed to be spent in the area (LB Camden):
- other uses for which contributions may be sought include
hotels, hostels and halls of residence (LB Camden), holiday parks,
static caravan sites and dwellings subject to holiday let
conditions (North Devon)
Paragraph 23 of PPG 17 refers to the use of obligations relating
to new development ‘especially housing’, thus not ruling out uses
other than housing.
Policies and SPD Frameworks
Mole Valley prepared a Code of Practice as part
of a collaboration project with the 11 Surrey Districts and the
County Council to set out common practice and procedures for making
infrastructure contributions across the majority of these
districts. Subsequently Mole Valley council has agreed to
amend the Local Development Scheme in order to consolidate the Code
into the Local Development Framework as a Supplementary Planning
Document. It will apply to planning applications received
after 1st February 2008 for additional housing and/or commercial
floorspace.
The Code of Practice, where applied to community facilities
which include indoor leisure facilities, states:
‘…Cost of provision would vary according to the type of
facility, but to enable a standard charge to be levied a
conservative estimate of £150,000 per 1,000 population will be
used. This is similar to the level used elsewhere (e.g. Windsor and
Maidenhead) and derives from the cost (excluding land purchase) of
providing a new facility (for a minimum threshold of 2000
population) of £300,000. The resulting tariff per additional person
would be £150.’
[Mole Valley District Council, (2006) Supplementary Planning
Document S106 Code of Practice for Planning Infrastructure
Contributions, p10]
Bracknell Forest’s Supplementary Planning
Document, Limiting the Impact of Development (2007) para 8.3
includes a section on Built Sport Facilities. In addition to
seeking contributions from all additional housing the Borough has
decided that it is reasonable to take contributions from major
employment proposals. The level of contributions is shown in the
table below:
| Development Type |
Proposal |
Contribution |
|
Business B1 development all employment uses within planning Use
Class B1 including:
• Redevelopment
• Changes of use
|
Net increase of more than 2,500m2 floorspace |
£335/100m2 of net additional business floorspace
towards the cost of providing, expanding or improving local built
sports facilities capable of serving |
Employees impact from business development is estimated to be
1/5th of a resident. The cost of mitigating employee impact
is calculated to be £335/net additional 100m2. The SPD states
that the method and calculation of financial contributions reflect
the most up-to-date version (January ’07) of Sport England’s Sports
Facilities Calculator.
In North Devon eligible employment uses are
defined as developments in use classes A1, A2, B1, B2 and B8 which
exceed 1000 sq metres gross floor space and/or would be expected to
employ 20 or more people on site.
These uses may contribute to the following sport and recreation
categories;
- playing pitches;
- multi use games areas; and
- informal open space.
The occupancy of the employment space is calculated from the
following table
Employment densities
| Use class |
Use |
Persons per sq m |
| A1 |
Shops |
20 |
| A2 |
Banks, building societies |
20 |
| B1 |
Offices, light industry |
30 |
| B2 |
General industry |
35 |
| B8 |
Wholesale warehouse |
50 |
Example: Contributions from a shop/bank development
| |
Sports pitches |
MUGAs |
Informal open space
|
Total |
| 100 sq m of 1/A2 |
£ 350 |
£ 1,250 |
£ 812 |
£2,412 |
Source: North Devon District Council
In the London Borough of Camden, policy N4 of
the Revised Deposit Draft UDP (2004) states:
‘…To ensure that public open space deficiency is not created or
made worse, the Council will only grant planning permission for
development that is likely to lead to an increased use of open
space where an appropriate contribution to the supply of public
open space is made’.
This policy applies to development involving 1000 sq m of floor
space or more. The draft SPG gives the occupancy of offices
as 50 persons per sq m and of high education uses as 50 persons per
sq m. Office use are expected to contribute to amenity open
space, may need to contribute to outdoor sports facilities, but not
children’s play. Students are regarded as major users of
amenity open space and formal recreation space, including multi use
games areas.
The Council is planning to only seek one third of the calculated
contribution for office space on the basis that use is only
generally for eight hours of the day. This reduction does not
apply to hotels, hostels or student halls of residence.
In Windsor and Maidenhead the Council is
seeking contributions to indoor sports and public open space
provision from all applications for business development.
The Council states:
‘…commercial developments put pressure on existing facilities
within the Borough since workers frequently use existing
recreational facilities at lunchtime and after work, with some
companies having memberships at sports and community centres.
Users of these facilities are not always residents of the Borough
and additional burdens are put on Borough resources as a
result.’
[RB Windsor and Maidenhead, (2003) Planning Obligations and
Developer Contributions, Feb 2003, pp 46-47]
In South Northamptonshire, the District Council
takes a similar position. In its document
Developer Contributions: Policy Statement (2003), the
Council states that where appropriate a financial contribution will
be sought. This will be based on the estimated number of people
likely to be employed by the development who do not already live in
South Northamptonshire.[page 38 of document]
In Gateshead, the draft SPG states that;
‘…on all new developments for employment uses, and retail
developments with a gross area of at least 0.5 hectares, at least
15% of the total site area should be provided as landscaped areas,
wildlife habitats or public open space, including recreation areas
where appropriate’.
[Draft SPG 5: Provision of Open Space andLandscaping in
NewDevelopments, Gateshead MBC, July 2004, p 4]
In Wokingham, policy WR 8 of the Wokingham
District Local Plan (2004), states:
‘…Provision should be made for the likely need for recreational
and leisure facilities, including open space, in association with
new commercial developments. Where a site cannot physically,
or appropriately, accommodate the required open space, the balance
will be sought through financial contributions towards the future
provision of new, or the enhancement of existing, off-site
facilities’.
The off site contribution standard for employment is 1.5 ha of
open space per 1000 employees. The areas of open space will
be expected to be of a size shape and location suitable for
recreational use by employees in the vicinity of the
development. The provision sought will include essential
facilities connected with it such as changing
facilities/pavilions. This requirement will normally be
sought from development on sites of over one hectare or buildings
in excess of 2,000 sq m.
[Wokingham Council (2004) p 151 of District Local Plan.
and SPG of Jan 2002, p 73-74].